@Article{BrunsellOlBaShMoAr:2021:CoNoMO,
author = "Brunsell, Nathaniel A. and Oliveira, Gabriel de and Barlage,
Michael and Shimabukuro, Yosio Edemir and Moraes, Elisabete Caria
and Arag{\~a}o, Luiz Eduardo Oliveira e Cruz de",
affiliation = "{University of Kansas} and {University of Kansas} and {National
Center for Atmospheric Research} and {Instituto Nacional de
Pesquisas Espaciais (INPE)} and {Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas
Espaciais (INPE)} and {Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas Espaciais
(INPE)}",
title = "Examination of seasonal water and carbon dynamics in eastern
Amazonia: a comparison of Noah-MP and MODIS",
journal = "Theoretical and Applied Climatology",
year = "2021",
volume = "143",
pages = "571--583",
abstract = "The Amazon region of Brazil is a vitally important region for
water and carbon cycling both for the region and the globe. This
region is experiencing the impacts of global climate change as
well as local land cover changes. Here, we investigated water and
carbon estimates and related remotely sensed variables from both
MODIS satellite and the Noah-MP land surface model for 3 years
(20152017) in the state of Mato Grosso, Brazil. Land surface
temperature agrees well between MODIS and the model, while the
leaf area index (LAI) is higher in the model simulations. The
monthly evapotranspiration (ET) from MODIS (MOD16A2) and gross
primary productivity (GPP, MOD17A2) were lower than, but well
correlated with, the model simulations. A noticeable exception was
in the Broadleaf Forest class, which accounts for approximately
50% of the land cover in the state, where the modeled LAI was out
of phase with the satellite observations, resulting in
significantly poorer performance in the water and carbon fluxes
for that land cover class. In addition, we investigated the
sensitivity of the ET and GPP to precipitation forcing. The
modeled ET relationships show correlations of approximately 0.6
for all classes (Broadleaf Forest being the exception, 0.24),
while the MODIS shows reduced values averaging about 0.5
(Broadleaf Forest = 0.03). The slopes of the relationships
illustrated the same sensitivity between MODIS and Noah-MP with
the exception of Grasslands and Open Shrublands. The GPP
relationships with precipitation show lower correlations across
all land cover types for both MODIS and Noah-MP, with the slopes
being significantly different for the Open Shrublands and
Broadleaf Forest classes. In each of these classes, the Noah-MP
simulations resulted in increased sensitivity to precipitation
than was observed in the MODIS products. We highlight that this
comparison is essential for increasing our understanding of how
these different sources estimate water and carbon cycling and can
be utilized for assessing the impacts of climate and land cover
change in the region.",
doi = "10.1007/s00704-020-03435-6",
url = "http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00704-020-03435-6",
issn = "0177-798X",
language = "en",
targetfile = "Brunsell2021_Article_ExaminationOfSeasonalWaterAndC.pdf",
urlaccessdate = "09 maio 2024"
}